Showing posts with label #Solar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #Solar. Show all posts

18 February, 2017

Toledo #PV: the Oldest #Solar 1MW #Power #Plant #In the World has Operated since 23 years (1993%2016)

Toledo-PV was the photovoltaic power plant that inaugurated the power scale of the MWs in Europe. It began to operate in 1993, so it has already completed 23 years of operation and, standstill better, good operation, as recent article on the operating experience of previous years shows: «Toledo-PV Plant 1MWp and 20 Years of Operation»

Toledo-PV: The Oldest Solar 1MW In the World has been Operating for 23 years 1993/2016
Abstract/Summary: The paper is a summary of the energy production during the 20 years, 1994-2014, of operation of the photovoltaic plant, Toledo-PV. The photovoltaic power plant, located close to the “La Puebla de Montalbán” village In Toledo (Spain). Toledo-PV plant with a nominal power of 1 MWp was inaugurated in July 1994 and has operated satisfactorily since that time providing electricity to the Spanish grid. The plant is owned equally by three companies: Enel Green Power, RWE and Gas Natural Fenosa.

Author(s):  M. Alonso-Abella, F. Chenlo, A. Alonso, D. González
Keywords: Evaluation, Large Grid-Connected PV Systems, Performance
Topic: OPERATIONS, PERFORMANCE AND RELIABILITY OF PHOTOVOLTAICS (from Cells to Systems)
Subtopic: Operation of PV Systems and Plants
Event: 29th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition
Session: 5BV.1.44
Pages: 2728 - 2733
ISBN: 3-936338-34-5
Paper DOI: 10.4229/EUPVSEC20142014-5BV.1.44
Price: 0,00 EUR
Document(s): paper, poster 

Some years earlier there had been another power plant with MW power in the USA. But it used conventional photovoltaic modules in combination with V-shaped side mirrors, which practically doubled the incident irradiance. Under these conditions, the modules degraded rapidly, losing 40% of their power in four years of operation, which led to the dismantling of the plant.

Electrical Degradation of the Carrisa Plains Power Plant
Author(s):Schaefer J.EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Rosenthal A. Southwest Technology Development Inst., Las Cruces, NM, USA
Schlueter L. Siemens Solar Industries, Camarillo, CA, USA
WengerH. Pacific Gas and Electric Co, San Ramon, CA, USA
Book Title: Tenth E.C. Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference
Book Subtitle: Proceedings of the International Conference, held at Lisbon, Portugal, 8–12 April 1991
ISBN: 978-94-010-5607-6
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-3622-8
Print Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3622-8
Publisher Springer Netherlands
Copyright Holder ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg

Some years earlier there had been another power plant with MW power in the USA. But it used conventional photovoltaic modules in combination with V-shaped side mirrors, which practically doubled the incident irradiance. Under these conditions, the modules degraded rapidly, losing 40% of their power in four years of operation, which led to the dismantling of the plant. Thus, Toledo-PV is the oldest photovoltaic >1MW PV alive utility in the world and the first one that exceeds 20 years of useful life, a ribbon that, although nobody knows very well why, is usually interpreted as conclusive of technological maturity.

Both attributes, antiquity and reliability give Toledo-PV the venerable condition that, coupled with the fact that in its construction concurred some first-fruits of interest, make of Toledo-PV a project deserving of the historical name, whose event deserves more celebration of the Which he has so far. (The first story was published on September 5, 2016).

At this point it is important to insist that this lack of celebration reaches not only the scope of the rumor that could be made with the banner of "... I am the one who has the oldest PhotoVoltaic MW in the world ...". More regrettable is that this lack extends to the field of scientific production. Toledo-PV is a project designed, executed and operated by private companies (Endesa, RWE Energie AC and Unión Fenosa, coordinated by the latter) which, as such, have all the legitimacy not to advertise information that could constitute a competitive advantage for them. But Toledo-PV is also a project that was financed exclusively with Public money and from that, as such, one would expect returns in knowledge of general interest. The aging of the photovoltaic modules is one of the aspects on which Toledo-PV should have generated public and rigorous knowledge. It is not possible at this point to imagine a conflict of interest, since neither of the two types of modules used in its construction - Saturn modules of BP Solar, and modules MIS of Nukem - is realized in the current market. However what has been published about Toledo-PV is minimal and disappointing. After a series of articles published in the years 1994 and 1995:

1st 1MW Solar PhotoVoltaic Power Station In Spain -Plant Description & Gained Experience During Construction- Toledo-PV
Contributors: Hill, R. / Palz, W. / Helm, P.
Conference: European photovoltaic solar energy conference; 12th; 1994; Amsterdam
Size: 4 pages
ISBN: 0952145243, 0952145235
Type of media: Conference paper
Type of material:Print
Language: English
Keywords: Photovoltaic solar energy, solar energy

100 kWp tracking PV plant at the Toledo PV Project,
Jiménez C, Lorenzo E, Yordi B.  Proc.12th European PVSEC, Amsterdam, 1994; 822-824.

The Data Acquisition System for the 1MW PV Plant in Toledo, Spain. 
Mukadam K, Chenlo F. Proc. 12th European PVSEC. Amsterdam 1994; 818-821.

PV modules and Array Testat Toledo PV plant.
Lorenzo E., Zilles R., Proc. 12th EU PVSEC, Amsterdam 1994, 807-809.

Operational Results of the 100 kWp Tracking PV plant at Toledo-PV Project.
Lorenzo E., Maquedano C., Valera P. Proc. 13th EU PVSEC, Nice (1995), 755-758.

The 1 MW PV Photovoltaic Plant in Toledo, Spain. First Operational Results and Operating experiences, Mukadam K., Chenlo F., Proc. 13th EU PVSEC, Nice (1995).

All these old publications, created in the heat of the constructive impulse and basically describe aspects related to the construction of some of its elements, such as the follower or the data acquisition system, there have been only two communications to the European photovoltaic congress, one in 2005 and another that opens here the list of references.

There is here a double pity. On the one hand, for the loss of what could have been learned in terms of resistance to weathering materials that have a presence in the current technological landscape, such as encapsulation polymers, oxides of the AR layers or metals of the electrical contacts of the cells. On the other hand, because the absence of rigorous information pays for the flourishing of another, more rumorous than rigorous, which, based on only half-truths, conveys frankly erroneous messages.

A paradigmatic example of the latter is the recent publication in journalistic media [1], sometimes more prone to rumor than to rigor, of the news that says that the original modules of the Toledo-PV plant have been replaced by new ones "Retrofit". The news, true in itself, is published together with comments suggesting, first, that the original modules of Toledo-PV had been much degraded - "... in the last study, carried out in August 2015, the effective power had been reduced by 37%" - second, that the current modules are technologically much superior to the original ones - "... these are modules with a new technology that produces 20% more in unfavorable conditions Of 'mismatch' caused by shadows, dirt, aging, temperature gradients, etc. - and, thirdly, that the fact of changing the modules has made it possible to learn a lot - "... this 'revamping' has allowed us to know, with real and quantifiable magnitudes, that the useful life of a photovoltaic plant is 22 years ...".

Well, it is easy to understand that none of these three things honors the truth. What appears to have actually occurred with the original modules of Toledo-PV was not natural degradation but a consequence of a manufacturing failure in an internal welding of the modules. The difference is a lot, because the natural degradation is general and irreversible, whereas a welding failure is particular and reversible. Thus, the news attributes a quality to the general without more support than a particular circumstance. Something like 1) Pepe has mumps, 2) Pepe is man, ergo 3) All men have mumps. If Aristotle raised his head! That a 37% power reduction is not a general health condition but a particular disease is well done without comparing the figure with the many others available in the literature and even with what was published on the same Toledo-PV shortly before , In the aforementioned reference for the year 2014, where it can be read that in July 2012 (ie 20 years after being put into operation), the modules had not degraded more than the equivalent of 0.2% per year, In the case of modules supplied by BP and 1% per year, in the case of those supplied by Nukem.
What is more, the news says that change the modules (operation that the author of the news calls 'revamping', which is still indicative of scorn, because 'vamp' in English means rather better than substitute) has made it possible to know the useful life of a photovoltaic plant "with real and quantifiable magnitudes". In view of this, at least until other more complete information on such magnitudes has been published, that the logical consistency of the link between what is done (the change of modules) and what is learned (the useful life of the plants) is not greater than Of stating that by changing the spare tire of the car, after suffering a puncture, much is learned about the wear resistance of the rubber with which the tires are made. Finally, the technological improvement that the news attributes to the new modules can be put in solfa its wording, when it says that the new technology produces "20% more" but does not say what is the reference for this more. The question is, More than what? Of course it can not be the technology of the solar cells in itself, since the efficiency of the new ones is substantially similar to the previous ones. In this same order of things, a query to the official website of the project (www.toledopv.com) does nothing but increase disappointment. There is not even a mention of the recent change of modules! In short, nothing further from our intention than criticizing news of the press, let alone to those who do honestly fulfilling their work. But this does not prevent the conviction that Toledo-PV deserves much more and much more rigor than has been published until now.

The IES-UPM was lucky (and never better, because the opportunity was given and without doing anything for it) to participate in the construction of Toledo-PV. To put here in writing the memories of that participation is his way of contributing to extend that celebration. It is also their way of honoring the duty to record the firsts in which they had something to do, for information of those interested in the history of solar energy. And it is finally his way of thanking to the life the exquisite fortune of having participated in Toledo-PV.

They have not had any official relationship with Toledo-PV since 1995, so nothing can report on the lessons learned there over their more than 20 years of operation. The cause of the problem that led to the change of modules came to them via radio and non-existent delator. From what they heard, they made the diagnosis, aided by the fact that they had already encountered a similar problem in other plants with similar modules [2] [3]. They may even have mistaken a plan. Then, they would certainly be very grateful if someone who has more and more compliant information takes the trouble to report their error and provide other more truthful information here.

TOLEDO-PV IN BRIEF

Toledo-PV project was a project with an investment of approximately 10 M€ (then they were called Ecus, and still were not emitted in paper) that was covered with public subsidies contributed by two Programs (Joule and Thermie) of the European Union, by the German Ministry of Science and Technology (BMFT) and by the Spanish Electrotechnical Research Program. The proponents were Unión Fenosa, Endesa, RWE, BP Solar, Nukem and WIP.


The project was structured around two main lines: the use of photovoltaic modules of last generation and the participation of electric companies. The declared objectives were, on the one hand, to demonstrate the technical feasibility of the technology and, on the other hand, to involve the major players in the conventional electric sector, to pave the way for future photovoltaic penetration in the network. The price of photovoltaic systems was of the order of 10€ /W, which resulted in electricity generation costs of more than €1/ kWh [4]. Because this cost is at least 15 times higher than generating electricity using conventional technologies (water, coal and nuclear), very few believed in the possibility of photovoltaic technology getting to where it is today. Here comes as a finger to quote Machiavelli's wise assertion about "the unbelief of men, who-in fact-never believe in the new until they acquire a firm experience of it." [5]

THE SITE: 39° 49´51.65"N 4° 17´52,2" O; hasl: 430m

Toledo-PV is located in lands of the reservoir of Castrejón, in the Tajo, near La Puebla de Montalbán. It is a medium-sized reservoir (S=750 Ha & 45 Hm³ of Volume) that feeds the hydroelectric power station of "Carpio del Tajo", of 8 MW, and on whose banks you can enjoy the extraordinary landscape of the "Barrancas de Burujón". Demonstration projects are always a fertile ground for finding reasons, including pilgrimages, to justify their spending. In this case, and although we do not know if came to appear in the papers, there were repeated mentions to the possibility of taking advantage of the coincidence of the reservoir and the photovoltaic power station to study the complementarity of the sun and water as energy resources. Neither such a study came to fruition nor does it seem to make sense. Happens that the flow of water through this reservoir depends, of course, on the rains in the river basin, but also and especially on the irrigation needs in the area, which is the priority application of the reservoir water.

PV GENERATORS: Saturn and MIS-IL Technologies.

The 1-MW of Toledo-PV is divided into three photovoltaic generators: two static 450 kW each (nominal value) and one with horizontal axis tracking and power of 100 kW (figure 1).



The cells of the modules that make up one of the large generators and the small generator are of Saturn technology, manufactured by BP; And those of the modules that constitute the other generator are of MIS-IL technology (metal-insulator-silicon inversion layer), manufactured by Nukem. Both technologies were then presented as "state of the art". The encapsulation of the BP modules is totally conventional (glass-EVA-Tedlar), whereas the one of the modules Nukem presents some variation (glass-resin-glass).

Saturn technology introduced the novelty of "buried contacts" in laser-cut grooves on the surface of cells. The technology had been developed in Australia by the team of the University of New South Wales, directed by Martin Green. BP had bought the patent and opened a factory in Spain, in Tres Cantos, for its industrialization. In addition to reducing the surface of the metallized plug-in cell, which is inherent to the burial of the contacts (Figure 2-b), this technology significantly reduced the emitter's doping, compared to conventional technology. The air gap resulted in an increase in the short-circuit current and the reduction of doping in increasing the open-circuit voltage, thus achieving the highest efficiency of silicon cells at that time: 18% compared to 14% offered by the conventional.



Nukem's MIS-IL technology had been proposed in Germany by Professor Hezel of the University of Erlangen [6] and characterized because the pn junction, which generates the internal electric field separating voids and electrons, instead of being created by the A conventional process of diffusing phosphorus impurities (emitter "n") onto a silicon wafer with boron impurities (base "p"), was induced by the deposition on the front surface of the "p" wafer of a very thin layer ( Tunnel) of silicon oxide incorporating positive electric charges (Figure 2-c). The result was a cell with a very low-conducting emitter and which had to be accompanied by a particularly delicate metallization grid (many fingers at the same time very thin) to compensate for the negative effect of the low conductivity of the emitter on the cell's series resistance . This "induced junction" technology allowed the cell manufacturing process to be carried out entirely at temperatures below 500°C (in contrast to diffusion, which requires approaching 1000°C), which supposedly offered some advantages for the manufacture of solar cells on thin wafers. The foregoing paragraphs are written in the past, because these innovative cell technologies used in Toledo-PV have in common that none of them are currently in production, so that "last generation" is almost an invitation to jest. However, this does not tarnish the heavy weight of this project in demonstrating the durability of photovoltaic technology, since the non-innovative components of the technology, namely the use of crystalline silicon as a base material and the techniques of Encapsulated modules, also present in Toledo-PV, are the main responsible for this durability and maintain their validity in the current industrial landscape. The technology of the cells was the most visible but not the only novelty relative to the photovoltaic modules that Toledo-PV attended. So was the quality control of its power. As IES-UPM states in EraSolar, Toledo-PV was the first project to establish a contractual relationship between the amount paid to suppliers of photovoltaic modules and the results of the characteristic power measurements carried out by an independent body.

This, which is fortunately today a widespread custom, had to face, then, not a few resistors, rooted in the practice of supplying modules whose actual power was significantly lower than the nominal power. Surely it is a crowd who can rightly feel that they has done much to eradicate this harmful practice. But with the calendar in hand, it's easy to see that the scoop took place in Toledo-PV. The IES-UPM was the one who proposed and carried out the quality of modules. The power measurements were made against real sun and by comparison with previously calibrated by CIEMAT references. The following is a brief history of what happened.

STATIC GENERATORS & 1-Horizontal Axis Sun-Trackers

The original Toledo-PV design was only generators mounted over 30° static structures. Simple and robust, the solar radiation captured by these structures is limited by their own statism. Toledo-PV's are made of galvanized steel and employ approximately 40 kg of steel and 0.1 m³ of cement (in the shoe) per square meter of generator [7]. In today's plants, piles driven by hammer blow are more frequent than the shoes, but with respect to the support structures themselves, the figure of 40 kg of steel per m² still indicates very optimized designs; Although with a certain downward tendency, as a result of which the inclination angles are also somewhat lower, rather in the environment of 20 than of 30 degrees. Later on and at the proposal of the IES-UPM, the project included a follower of a horizontal axis. The followers, of course, increase the uptake of solar radiation, but at the price of incorporating moving elements that usually arouse suspicions about their reliability.


Monitoring on a horizontal axis represents a good compromise between reliability and radiation uptake. Because it is horizontal, the axis can be very long (it does not rise from the ground as it grows) and can be strongly anchored to the ground at regular intervals, as with static structures. In fact, the eyes of the uninitiated often have difficulty distinguishing prima facie between static structures and horizontal followers. The axis is oriented in the direction NS, so the tracking is such that ideally the normal to the surface of the generator describes daily a semicircle that starts pointing east (in the morning) and ends pointing west (in the afternoon) , And the angle of rotation is adjusted at each moment so that the plane containing the axis is normal also contains the Sun. Strictly speaking, in a field of several followers and if the movement were just so, there would be important shadows both by the Morning and afternoon, when the angle of elevation of the Sun is relatively low. To avoid this, the tracking strategy incorporates a "back-tracking" algorithm, which diverts the angle of rotation from the ideal position to avoid shadows. By exerting a little visual imagination, the reader should understand that, with this algorithm, the follower dawns and lies horizontally. Solar trackers with horizontal axis are an invention prior to photovoltaic cells.

The first practical design [8] was proposed in 1884 by John Ericsson, a Swedish engineer who a few years before had achieved world renown for inventing the propeller for naval propulsion. And the solar pump that Frank Shuman designed and installed in Maadi (Egypt) and which operated regularly for almost 5 years (providing a mechanical power of more than 50 HP) consisted of 5 solar collectors each 60 meters long by 4 meters Wide and 8 meters apart. These collectors, which were thermal and concentrated (such as the parabolic trough collectors of the current solar thermal power plants), were a very important milestone in the history of solar plants. A few years after the Maadí solar bomb, the World attended the deployment of an impressive infrastructure for the extraction and distribution of coal and oil, which managed to make these fuels very cheap even in places far from mines and wells, opening a parenthesis in the history of solar energy, which did not resume until, in the 1970s, the first sounding of the oil crisis sounded, whose resonances spread throughout the world in the form of concern for oil-dependence Industrial society. A very well-known manifestation of this concern was the PSA (Solar Platform of Almería), in which thermal collectors were also equipped with monitoring in a horizontal axis. And this is related to Toledo-PV because they were, in fact, the same engineers who had designed the trackers structures that makes the motor torque in the very large tracker  axis, allowing to move loosely the 200 m² of the collector, ready for extreme wind situations. In addition, the high multiplication factor also allows to easily control the tracker angle [9], without counting the laps of the motor (1 lap of the motor corresponds to half a minute of degree, which is a huge precision for the requirements of this application). The Toledo-PV tracker was manufactured by Jupasa, a Spanish company specialized in the manufacture and assembly of metallic transformations of great dimensions and high precision. Nowaday the oldest living PV-Tracker in the world and still enjoys excellent health, which saves more comments on the goodness of his design. The control system was developed by the IES-UPM. The following is a brief history of this development.

PV Inverters: Tyristhors and IGBTs

DC/AC converters are widely used power electronics equipment: AC motors, power supplies and, most recently, photovoltaic inverters.

The heart of these equipments is constituted by a block of switches, or switches, whose ordered action allows to obtain pulse trains from dc. How these switches are to a large extent defines technology, and Toledo-PV coincided with the dawn of a transition in the field of these devices: the thyristors, which at that time were the mambo dance kings, were replaced by the faster IGBTs, notably easier to handle. Thus, in 1994, Toledo-PV included two inverters with thyristors of 450 kW each, associated with static generators, and an inverter of 100 kW IBGTs, associated to the generator with horizontal tracking. All of them were manufactured by Enertron, and there was the remarkable circumstance that the 100 kW inverter was for some time the European size record in power electronics equipment with IGBTs. All three had a lot of prototypes and their operation and maintenance associated the difficulties of this condition, so that some 7 years later they were replaced by inverters of IGBTs that were already standard equipment in the market. This change is not discussed here in greater detail, to understand that the traffic from the thyristors to the IGBTs was a process that was developed in the general scope of power electronics and in which photovoltaic did not have a particularly relevant role.


Sources:

[1] E. Lorenzo, R. Zilles. Era Solar Nov-Dic 2016 

[2] Progress in Photovoltaics: An investigation into hot-spots in two large grid-connected PV plants.
Muñoz J., Lorenzo E., Martinez-Moreno F., Marroyo L., Garcia M.,
Research and Applications 16 (2008), 693-701. DOI:10.1002/pip.844

[3] Progress in Photovoltaics: Observed degradation in photovoltaic plants affected by hot-spots.
Garcia M., Marroyo L., Lorenzo E., Marcos J., Pérez M.,  Research and Applications 22 (2013), 1292-1301.
DOI:10.1002/pip.2393

[4] Toledo-PV official web: does mention the figure of 1,1 €/kWh in this project; don't worth noting as this website has not been updated since 1998, which seems to be a symptom of the scarce celebration for more than twenty years ago.

[5] N. Machiavelli, The Prince, chapter VI.

[6] R. Hezel, R. Schörner, J. Appl. Phys., vol 52(4), pp 3076-3079, 1981.

[7] Estimated from data contained in: M. Alonso et al. 1 MW PhotoVoltaic Power Station Toledo/Spain - Plant Description and Gained Experience during Construction - Toledo-PV. 12th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, 1163-1166, Amsterdam (1994).

[8] K. Butti y J. Perlin, A Golden Thread (1980). (There is a castillian translation: "Un hilo dorado: 2.500 años de arquitectura y tecnología solar", Ed Blume, 1985).

[9] The design of this tracker included two pulleys of almost one meter in diameter, separated almost 100 meters, strongly anchored to the ground and through which a thick steel cord passed, which transmitted the rotation of the pulleys to the axes of the follower's collectors . This design had a defect that proved fatal: this steel cable, which by its very function had to be well-tensioned, easily oscillated (like a guitar string), causing considerable mechanical damage.

01 February, 2017

NOOR #PV 1 Moroccan #Solar #Power #Project will supply electricity at 0.042 €/kWh w/o FITs subsidies


Moroccan Agency for Solar Energy (Masen) has revealed that the consortium led by Acwa Power, which was awarded the Noor PV 1 photovoltaic project of 170 MW last November, will supply electricity for the next 20 years at a price of 0.042 euros per kWh.

Energy Newspaper previously reported that public agency Masen had signed a 20-year energy purchase agreement (PPA) with Acwa Power for the development of 170 MW of solar photovoltaic plants.

The new project, called Noor PV1, actually consists of three plants located in different places: a 70 MW photovoltaic plant located in Ouarzazate; Another 80 MW plant located in El Aaiún, and a third 20 MW plant located in Bojador.

Masen has now reported that "the combined rate for the kilowatt hour (kWh) of the three projects that make up the Noor PV 1 project (with a total capacity of approximately 170 MW) is 0.46 dirhams (€ 0.042)." An extraordinarily low price considering that Morocco has no subsidies (FITs)

Saudi Arabia's Acwa Power was selected after an international tender to develop, build and operate the three plants under the BOOT (Build, Operate, Own and Transfer) regime.

Masen has also confirmed that "the three photovoltaic plants will have to be transferred to Masen (and not to the Onee which is the national electricity company) at the end of the energy purchase agreement." That is, 20 years after the date of the start-up of the plants, which is scheduled for early 2018.

Meanwhile, the photovoltaic sector is awaiting the results of the tender for the first phase of the Noor Midelt solar complex. Masen told pvmagazine that "this phase would encompass two hybrid photovoltaic projects and solar thermal power plants with storage. The CSP gross capacity is expected to be between 150 MW and 190 MW for each project."

Source: El Periódico de la Energía

30 October, 2016

Solar PV Self Consumption In Germany

With three years in a row above 7 GW of PV systems connected to the grid, Germany used to be the most iconic PV market for years . This has been achieved thanks to a combination of several elements:

• A long term stability of support schemes;
• The confidence of investors;
• The appetite of residential, commercial and industrial building owners for PV.

From 2013 to 2015, the PV market went down to 3.3 GW then 1.46 GW, below the political will to frame the development of PV within a 2.4-2.6 GW range each year. This results into a total installed PV capacity of 39.7 GW connected to the electricity grid at the end of 2015. 2015 was also the year that saw China overtaking Germany and installing itself in the very first place.


Feed-in Tariff with a Corridor

The EEG law has introduced the FiT idea and has continued to promote it partially. It introduces a FiT for PV electricity that is mutualised in the electricity bill of electricity consumers. Exemption is applied to energy-intensive industries, a situation that was challenged by the European Commission in 2013. With the fast price decrease of PV, Germany introduced the “Corridor” concept in 2009: a method allowing the level of FiTs to decline according to the market evolution. The more the market grows during a defined period of time, the lower the FiT levels are. In the first version, the period between two updates of the tariffs was too long (up to 6 months) and triggered some exceptional market booms (the biggest one came in December 2011 with 3 GW in one single month). In September 2012, the update period was reduced to one month, with an update announced every three months, in an attempt to better control market evolution. The latest change has been put in place since August 2014.

With a level of PV installations in 2015 almost 1 GW below the 2.4-2.6 GW corridor, the FIT decline was stopped. This procedure that was supposed to control the growth of the market is now used in Germany to halt the severe market decline.

In September 2012, Germany abandoned FiT for installations above 10 MW in size and continued to reduce FiT levels in 2013 and 2014.

Self-consumption

The self-consumption premium that was paid above the retail electricity price was the main incentive to self-consume electricity rather than injecting it into the grid. The premium was higher for self-consumption above 30%. On the 1st April 2012, the premium was cancelled when FiT levels went below the retail electricity prices. With the same idea, for systems between 10 kW and 1 MW, a cap was set at 90% in order to force self-consumption. If the remaining 10% has to be injected anyway, a low market price is paid instead of the FiT.

Since August 2014, 30% of the surcharge for renewable electricity will have to be paid by prosumers for the self-consumed electricity for systems above 10 kW. This part will increase up to 40% in 2017.

An Incentive or Policy program for storage units was introduced 1st May 2013, which aims at increasing self-consumption and developing PV with battery storage in Germany. A 25 M€ market stimulation program has been introduced to boost the installation of local stationary storage systems in conjunction with small PV systems (< 30 kWp). Within the framework of this storage support program around 20,000 decentralized local storage systems were funded by the end of 2015. A continuation of the program is planned for 2016. It is interesting to mention that in addition to incentivized storage systems, additional ones were installed without incentives, around 9,000 in 2015.

Market Integration Model

In contrast to self-consumption incentives, Germany pushes PV producers to sell electricity on the electricity market through a “market premium”. The producer can decide to sell its electricity on the market during a period of time instead of getting the fixed tariff and receiving an additional premium on the top of the market price. The producer can go back and forth between the FiT system and the market as often as necessary. New PV installations > 500 kWp (from 2016 on PV installations > 100 kWp) are obligated to direct marketing of generated electricity.

In 2015, within the “market integration model” three pilot auctions have taken place for utility-scale PV installations. The three calls covered a capacity of 500 MW altogether and were characterized by a high degree of competition. The price level was reduced from call to call: from 0.0917 €/kWh it declined continuously: The most recent price obtained from the fifth solar auction in August 2016 was 0.0723 €/kWh.

Grid Integration

Due to the high penetration of PV in some regions of Germany, new grid integration regulations were introduced. The most notable ones are:

• The frequency disconnection settings of inverters (in the past set at 50.2 Hz) has been changed to avoid a cascade disconnection of all PV systems in case of frequency deviation.

Peak shaving at 70% of the maximum power output (systems below 30 kW) that is not remotely controlled by the grid operator.

Critical Energy Observatory (OCE) has just published a report on self-consumption in which three specific issues are addressed: legislation (aspects of it that have facilitated the development of consumption elsewhere); shared facilities; and the relationship between energy consumption and poverty. The Observatory analyzes three experiences: the German, the California case and Cyprus. Here an outline collection of this analysis by the OCE about the German case.

How Solar PV Self-Consumption is regulated in Germany with an Average PV Yield of 1,055 kWh/kW/year?

"A self-consumption to democratize the electrical system." That's the title of the latest report that has recently come up by the Critical Energy Observatory, this think tank that was founded by a group of young engineers and scientists in early 2007 and continues to produce since reports focusing on the world of energy. The last, this, on consumption. In it addresses three very specific experiences: Germany, California and Cyprus. Here we will focus on the German case, which is particularly relevant to begin their climate, certainly -between the three- farthest from the Spanish.

Indeed, in Germany, solar radiation supply numbers are far from those recorded in Spain. However, a strong policy supporting the photovoltaic industry over the past quarter century stable and durable-policy has resulted in a national park photovoltaic unparalleled throughout Europe. At the end of 2015, Germany had 39,6 GW of installed solar photovoltaic power (PV). Moreover, during that year using this technology generation covered 7% of electricity demand. Far from these records, Spain had late last year 4,420 MW PV (ie, 4,42 GW... versus 39.6). That scrawny domestic photovoltaic park -ridiculous, compared with the German- generated last year in Spain 2.9% of the total produced electricity (sources: Red Eléctrica de España and EIA-PVPS.org).
European Solar Radiation Map from ww.ise.fraunhofer.de

The German Case of Success

The first pro-solar regulation legislation in Germany explains the OCE in his report was the Electricity Feed-in Act enacted in 1991. Between 1990 and 1995, the German government promoted the program of the "1,000 solar roofs". The success of this first program led to its extension by one more ambitious: that of the "100,000 solar roofs", which was developed between 1999 and 2003. However -shades the OCE-, the real impetus for the development of renewables was produced with the German Renewable Energy Act (EEG) of 2000, which guaranteed a fixed amount for the injected energy into the gridnetwork and recognized the right to collect payment for 20 years.

Of course, there is no “Sunshine-Taxes” itself, however overproduced injected energy is therefore remunerated

For PV installations with lower power consumption than ten kilowatts (10 kW), the procedure established by the EGG -explain from the OCE it is simple: the owners of the facility can consume directly generate electricity without paying any charge or tax . In other words, there is no tax in the sun. In addition continues the OCE-, pour energy network that do not use and receive a fixed price for it (Feed-in Tariff, FiT) the amount of which varies depending on the time of commissioning of the facility. There is also the option of receiving a fixed premium (Feed-in Premium, PIF) that adds to the value that reaches the electricity market, this scheme is known as "Market Model Integration". Payment of FiT is guaranteed for 20 years. [Down evolution of FiT and the price of electricity during the last 15 years].

Every two months

The Federal Agency (Bundesnetzagentur) published every two months, the amount of the FiT for new installations. This is it decreasing over time so that: (1) adjustment to falling technology prices; (2) have an incentive to improve the new facilities; and (3) associated dimension the total expenditure is committed over the next 20 years. Currently, the rate is between 0.12 and 0.08 euros per kilowatt hour (€/kWh), depending on the size of the installation.

As time goes by

Along with the evolution of the FiT, the price paid by consumers for domestic electricity in Germany has also evolved logically. Above we can see how, for installations made before 2011, self-consumers received, for each kWh hour injected into the network, a price (FiT for PV) greater than the price they had to pay to import a kilowatt hour network (price paid by households and industry for electricity). However, later that year for facilities, the crossing of the curves indicates that self-consumers receive a lower price per unit of energy injected into the network paid when importing this energy; that is, from that year, the remuneration system automatically encourages instantaneous consumption (consumption that occurs in times of generation).

Exemptions and/or tax benefits

In addition, facilities with power ranging from 10 kW and one megawatt (1MW) can only charge FiT by 90% of the electricity they generate. In other words, they must self-consum at least 10% of its electricity production. Consumption facilities also enjoy an advantageous situation as regards the tax EEG assessment. This tax, which is included in the electricity bill of all German consumers, is intended to finance the energy transition. On the one hand, self-consumption installations with less than 10kW they are exempt from this tax; on the other, those with a higher power, must pay only 35% of EEG assessment in 2016 and 40% in 2017.

The ownership of facilities

Explains the OCE in its report, "citizen participation is often cited as one of the main factors that have enabled the success of the energy transition in Germany". And certainly, of all renewable power was installed in Germany in 2012, 47% was in the hands of citizens and cooperatives "allowing - point from «Observatorio Crítico de la Energía» - evolution from a strongly oligopolistic towards a more democratic system." In this sense, the OCE believes that "the participation of citizens and investors in new renewable projects also implies a greater social acceptance of the transition, even though this has meant an increase in electricity rates."

The reasons of its success

According to the Observatory, the main aspects that have allowed the development of renewable energy facilities owned by citizens, farmers and consumer cooperatives is the existence of conditions of remuneration of the energy generated "simple and stable." As noted by several of the sources consulted the OCE- explains, "the fact that producers are guaranteed a fixed income through a FiT is maintained for 20 years has been key to many of them have decided to participate in electric sector ". [Down, graphic referred to the facilities of ten kilowatts less power, 10 kW].



The German government amended the EGG in August 2014

A study by the Federal Office of Cooperative Energies shows that cooperatives are planning to make an investment in the short term have increased from 92% in 2013 to 67% in 2014 and has decreased the number of newly formed cooperatives. The study attributed these decreases to the complexity introduced reform EGG. Furthermore, according to some experts consulted by the OCE, the reform involves "financial expenses that places cooperatives at a disadvantage with respect to large power companies".
Batteries

Another aspect that is very interesting from the German model concludes the OCE- is the incentive created for the installation of batteries with photovoltaic panels by Standard & Storage program. The German Development Bank grants to owners of systems with power less than 30 kW low-interest loans for the installation of these storage systems. In Spain, Mr. Rajoy government not only does not encourage the installation of battery systems in self-consumption facilities, but he has already devised a tax for that kind of sites.

Sunny Taxes?

Certainly, the tax on batteries devised by President Rajoy is recently paid by nobody.-It happens with it the same thing that is happening with the so -called “Sunshine Tax”, but in any case no longer weigh down the takeoff of a sector that surely would be launched if not for these threats Mr. Nadal has included in its Self-Generation Royal Decree - Far from Moncloa, the Canary Islands regional government has decided not to wait for a new government formation and has taken a step forward: a few weeks ago, it approved batteries subsidize consumption installations connected to the grid.

Why O&M Standardisation has become the key to PV’s future?

The maturing of the solar operations and maintenance business has shown a spotlight on the need for some universally accepted standards and practices across the industry. Vassilis Papaeconomou Alectris.com managing director explains why such a step forward will be vital to ensuring the full value of solar assets is realised.


A Self-Consumption Facility In Spain with an Average Yield of 1,500 kWh/kW/year (IEA PVPS)

Consecutive Spanish governments put in place a legal framework allowing that the revenues coming from the price of retail electricity were below total system costs, which created the tariff being paid by electricity consumers. The cumulated deficit amounts now to 15 M€ and it is estimated that the cost of renewables paid by electricity consumers has contributed to around 20% of this amount. In order to reduce this deficit, retroactive measures have been taken to reduce the FiTs already granted to renewable energy sources but no other significant measures have been taken to reduce the deficit.

In the summer of 2013, the Government announced a new reform of the electricity market. Under the 24/213 Power Sector Act, the FiT system was stopped in July 2013 and the new schemes are based on the remuneration of capacities rather than production. The new system is based on estimated standard costs, with a legal possibility to change the amounts paid every four years. This has caused many projects to be in a state of default. The biggest project has changed hands, since international investors found interests in the acquisition of this projects.

The 24/2013 Power Sector Act considers very restrictive forms of self-consumption. During 2015 the regulatory framework for self-consumption was developed under Royal Decree (RD) 900/2015. This RD established that the maximum capacity of the self-consumption installation must be equal or below the contracted capacity. It also specifies two types of self-consumers:
• Type 1: maximum capacity installed of 100 kW – there is no compensation for the electricity surplus fed in the grid.
• Type 2: no limit to the allowed capacity – the surplus can be sold in the wholesale market directly or through an intermediary. A specific grid tax of 0.5 €/MWh has to be paid together with a 7% tax on the electricity produced.

Regulation indicates that self-generated power above 10 kW is charged with a fee per kWh consumed as a “grid backup toll”, commonly known as the “sunshine tax”. Adding battery storage to the installation also implies an additional tax. Geographical compensation is not allowed, and self-consumption for several end customers or a community is not allowed.

The Spanish PV industry has obviously, still on the downside with taxes, applied to self-consumers and no feed-in-tariff at all. However, grid parity has been reached in Spain thanks to two factors: rich solar irradiation resource and good prices for components. Given the context of no feed-in-tariff, the future of the Spanish PV market lies in the deployment of big PV plants and the elimination of the self-consumption barriers. However, the opposition political parties and the main social stakeholders have expressed their support to a fair development of PV through self-consumption, and depending on the 2016 elections outcome in Spain, the regulation could change again. Given the need to meet the EU energy and climate 2020 targets and the Paris Agreement, It is of utmost importance that a new legislative framework is developed in Spain promoting the use of renewable energies again.

So Self-consumption is allowed in Spain. Tips to highlight:

· The size of the PV plant cannot exceed the maximum power contracted.
· Two different regulations exists depending on the system size:
·· Type 1: under 100 kW, self-consumption is allowed but the prosumer receives no compensation for the excess PV electricity injected into the grid.
·· Type 2: Above 100 kW without limitation, self-consumption is allowed and the excess PV electricity can be sold on the wholesale market directly or through an intermediary. A specific grid tax of 0.5 EUR/MWh has to be paid together with a 7% tax on the electricity produced.
· All systems used for self-consumption above 10 kW are charged with a fee per KWh consumed. It is justified as a “grid backup toll” and is known as the so-called “Sun tax”.
· At least two meters have to be installed, depending of the cases (LV or HV connection).
· Adding battery storage implies also an extra additional tax.
· Geographical compensation is not allowed, and self-consumption for several end customers or a community is not allowed.

± Tax Collector: Type 1 or Type 2
Spain’s Self-Consumption Schemes
Sources:

FAIR TRADING COMMISSION, Renewable Energy Rider Decision, 2013: http://bit.ly/1DLIeG4
"PRESS RELEASE -COMMISSION INCREASES THE CAPACITY LIMIT OF THE RENEWABLE ENERGY RIDER TO 9MW”, Fair Trading Commission, Barbados: http://bit.ly/1whpiGs
At The Heart of Clean Energy Journalism

EGA is registered as 14,302 Engineer at COITIMadrid