Showing posts with label PV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PV. Show all posts

30 October, 2016

Solar PV Self Consumption In Germany

With three years in a row above 7 GW of PV systems connected to the grid, Germany used to be the most iconic PV market for years . This has been achieved thanks to a combination of several elements:

• A long term stability of support schemes;
• The confidence of investors;
• The appetite of residential, commercial and industrial building owners for PV.

From 2013 to 2015, the PV market went down to 3.3 GW then 1.46 GW, below the political will to frame the development of PV within a 2.4-2.6 GW range each year. This results into a total installed PV capacity of 39.7 GW connected to the electricity grid at the end of 2015. 2015 was also the year that saw China overtaking Germany and installing itself in the very first place.


Feed-in Tariff with a Corridor

The EEG law has introduced the FiT idea and has continued to promote it partially. It introduces a FiT for PV electricity that is mutualised in the electricity bill of electricity consumers. Exemption is applied to energy-intensive industries, a situation that was challenged by the European Commission in 2013. With the fast price decrease of PV, Germany introduced the “Corridor” concept in 2009: a method allowing the level of FiTs to decline according to the market evolution. The more the market grows during a defined period of time, the lower the FiT levels are. In the first version, the period between two updates of the tariffs was too long (up to 6 months) and triggered some exceptional market booms (the biggest one came in December 2011 with 3 GW in one single month). In September 2012, the update period was reduced to one month, with an update announced every three months, in an attempt to better control market evolution. The latest change has been put in place since August 2014.

With a level of PV installations in 2015 almost 1 GW below the 2.4-2.6 GW corridor, the FIT decline was stopped. This procedure that was supposed to control the growth of the market is now used in Germany to halt the severe market decline.

In September 2012, Germany abandoned FiT for installations above 10 MW in size and continued to reduce FiT levels in 2013 and 2014.

Self-consumption

The self-consumption premium that was paid above the retail electricity price was the main incentive to self-consume electricity rather than injecting it into the grid. The premium was higher for self-consumption above 30%. On the 1st April 2012, the premium was cancelled when FiT levels went below the retail electricity prices. With the same idea, for systems between 10 kW and 1 MW, a cap was set at 90% in order to force self-consumption. If the remaining 10% has to be injected anyway, a low market price is paid instead of the FiT.

Since August 2014, 30% of the surcharge for renewable electricity will have to be paid by prosumers for the self-consumed electricity for systems above 10 kW. This part will increase up to 40% in 2017.

An Incentive or Policy program for storage units was introduced 1st May 2013, which aims at increasing self-consumption and developing PV with battery storage in Germany. A 25 M€ market stimulation program has been introduced to boost the installation of local stationary storage systems in conjunction with small PV systems (< 30 kWp). Within the framework of this storage support program around 20,000 decentralized local storage systems were funded by the end of 2015. A continuation of the program is planned for 2016. It is interesting to mention that in addition to incentivized storage systems, additional ones were installed without incentives, around 9,000 in 2015.

Market Integration Model

In contrast to self-consumption incentives, Germany pushes PV producers to sell electricity on the electricity market through a “market premium”. The producer can decide to sell its electricity on the market during a period of time instead of getting the fixed tariff and receiving an additional premium on the top of the market price. The producer can go back and forth between the FiT system and the market as often as necessary. New PV installations > 500 kWp (from 2016 on PV installations > 100 kWp) are obligated to direct marketing of generated electricity.

In 2015, within the “market integration model” three pilot auctions have taken place for utility-scale PV installations. The three calls covered a capacity of 500 MW altogether and were characterized by a high degree of competition. The price level was reduced from call to call: from 0.0917 €/kWh it declined continuously: The most recent price obtained from the fifth solar auction in August 2016 was 0.0723 €/kWh.

Grid Integration

Due to the high penetration of PV in some regions of Germany, new grid integration regulations were introduced. The most notable ones are:

• The frequency disconnection settings of inverters (in the past set at 50.2 Hz) has been changed to avoid a cascade disconnection of all PV systems in case of frequency deviation.

Peak shaving at 70% of the maximum power output (systems below 30 kW) that is not remotely controlled by the grid operator.

Critical Energy Observatory (OCE) has just published a report on self-consumption in which three specific issues are addressed: legislation (aspects of it that have facilitated the development of consumption elsewhere); shared facilities; and the relationship between energy consumption and poverty. The Observatory analyzes three experiences: the German, the California case and Cyprus. Here an outline collection of this analysis by the OCE about the German case.

How Solar PV Self-Consumption is regulated in Germany with an Average PV Yield of 1,055 kWh/kW/year?

"A self-consumption to democratize the electrical system." That's the title of the latest report that has recently come up by the Critical Energy Observatory, this think tank that was founded by a group of young engineers and scientists in early 2007 and continues to produce since reports focusing on the world of energy. The last, this, on consumption. In it addresses three very specific experiences: Germany, California and Cyprus. Here we will focus on the German case, which is particularly relevant to begin their climate, certainly -between the three- farthest from the Spanish.

Indeed, in Germany, solar radiation supply numbers are far from those recorded in Spain. However, a strong policy supporting the photovoltaic industry over the past quarter century stable and durable-policy has resulted in a national park photovoltaic unparalleled throughout Europe. At the end of 2015, Germany had 39,6 GW of installed solar photovoltaic power (PV). Moreover, during that year using this technology generation covered 7% of electricity demand. Far from these records, Spain had late last year 4,420 MW PV (ie, 4,42 GW... versus 39.6). That scrawny domestic photovoltaic park -ridiculous, compared with the German- generated last year in Spain 2.9% of the total produced electricity (sources: Red Eléctrica de España and EIA-PVPS.org).
European Solar Radiation Map from ww.ise.fraunhofer.de

The German Case of Success

The first pro-solar regulation legislation in Germany explains the OCE in his report was the Electricity Feed-in Act enacted in 1991. Between 1990 and 1995, the German government promoted the program of the "1,000 solar roofs". The success of this first program led to its extension by one more ambitious: that of the "100,000 solar roofs", which was developed between 1999 and 2003. However -shades the OCE-, the real impetus for the development of renewables was produced with the German Renewable Energy Act (EEG) of 2000, which guaranteed a fixed amount for the injected energy into the gridnetwork and recognized the right to collect payment for 20 years.

Of course, there is no “Sunshine-Taxes” itself, however overproduced injected energy is therefore remunerated

For PV installations with lower power consumption than ten kilowatts (10 kW), the procedure established by the EGG -explain from the OCE it is simple: the owners of the facility can consume directly generate electricity without paying any charge or tax . In other words, there is no tax in the sun. In addition continues the OCE-, pour energy network that do not use and receive a fixed price for it (Feed-in Tariff, FiT) the amount of which varies depending on the time of commissioning of the facility. There is also the option of receiving a fixed premium (Feed-in Premium, PIF) that adds to the value that reaches the electricity market, this scheme is known as "Market Model Integration". Payment of FiT is guaranteed for 20 years. [Down evolution of FiT and the price of electricity during the last 15 years].

Every two months

The Federal Agency (Bundesnetzagentur) published every two months, the amount of the FiT for new installations. This is it decreasing over time so that: (1) adjustment to falling technology prices; (2) have an incentive to improve the new facilities; and (3) associated dimension the total expenditure is committed over the next 20 years. Currently, the rate is between 0.12 and 0.08 euros per kilowatt hour (€/kWh), depending on the size of the installation.

As time goes by

Along with the evolution of the FiT, the price paid by consumers for domestic electricity in Germany has also evolved logically. Above we can see how, for installations made before 2011, self-consumers received, for each kWh hour injected into the network, a price (FiT for PV) greater than the price they had to pay to import a kilowatt hour network (price paid by households and industry for electricity). However, later that year for facilities, the crossing of the curves indicates that self-consumers receive a lower price per unit of energy injected into the network paid when importing this energy; that is, from that year, the remuneration system automatically encourages instantaneous consumption (consumption that occurs in times of generation).

Exemptions and/or tax benefits

In addition, facilities with power ranging from 10 kW and one megawatt (1MW) can only charge FiT by 90% of the electricity they generate. In other words, they must self-consum at least 10% of its electricity production. Consumption facilities also enjoy an advantageous situation as regards the tax EEG assessment. This tax, which is included in the electricity bill of all German consumers, is intended to finance the energy transition. On the one hand, self-consumption installations with less than 10kW they are exempt from this tax; on the other, those with a higher power, must pay only 35% of EEG assessment in 2016 and 40% in 2017.

The ownership of facilities

Explains the OCE in its report, "citizen participation is often cited as one of the main factors that have enabled the success of the energy transition in Germany". And certainly, of all renewable power was installed in Germany in 2012, 47% was in the hands of citizens and cooperatives "allowing - point from «Observatorio Crítico de la Energía» - evolution from a strongly oligopolistic towards a more democratic system." In this sense, the OCE believes that "the participation of citizens and investors in new renewable projects also implies a greater social acceptance of the transition, even though this has meant an increase in electricity rates."

The reasons of its success

According to the Observatory, the main aspects that have allowed the development of renewable energy facilities owned by citizens, farmers and consumer cooperatives is the existence of conditions of remuneration of the energy generated "simple and stable." As noted by several of the sources consulted the OCE- explains, "the fact that producers are guaranteed a fixed income through a FiT is maintained for 20 years has been key to many of them have decided to participate in electric sector ". [Down, graphic referred to the facilities of ten kilowatts less power, 10 kW].



The German government amended the EGG in August 2014

A study by the Federal Office of Cooperative Energies shows that cooperatives are planning to make an investment in the short term have increased from 92% in 2013 to 67% in 2014 and has decreased the number of newly formed cooperatives. The study attributed these decreases to the complexity introduced reform EGG. Furthermore, according to some experts consulted by the OCE, the reform involves "financial expenses that places cooperatives at a disadvantage with respect to large power companies".
Batteries

Another aspect that is very interesting from the German model concludes the OCE- is the incentive created for the installation of batteries with photovoltaic panels by Standard & Storage program. The German Development Bank grants to owners of systems with power less than 30 kW low-interest loans for the installation of these storage systems. In Spain, Mr. Rajoy government not only does not encourage the installation of battery systems in self-consumption facilities, but he has already devised a tax for that kind of sites.

Sunny Taxes?

Certainly, the tax on batteries devised by President Rajoy is recently paid by nobody.-It happens with it the same thing that is happening with the so -called “Sunshine Tax”, but in any case no longer weigh down the takeoff of a sector that surely would be launched if not for these threats Mr. Nadal has included in its Self-Generation Royal Decree - Far from Moncloa, the Canary Islands regional government has decided not to wait for a new government formation and has taken a step forward: a few weeks ago, it approved batteries subsidize consumption installations connected to the grid.

Why O&M Standardisation has become the key to PV’s future?

The maturing of the solar operations and maintenance business has shown a spotlight on the need for some universally accepted standards and practices across the industry. Vassilis Papaeconomou Alectris.com managing director explains why such a step forward will be vital to ensuring the full value of solar assets is realised.


A Self-Consumption Facility In Spain with an Average Yield of 1,500 kWh/kW/year (IEA PVPS)

Consecutive Spanish governments put in place a legal framework allowing that the revenues coming from the price of retail electricity were below total system costs, which created the tariff being paid by electricity consumers. The cumulated deficit amounts now to 15 M€ and it is estimated that the cost of renewables paid by electricity consumers has contributed to around 20% of this amount. In order to reduce this deficit, retroactive measures have been taken to reduce the FiTs already granted to renewable energy sources but no other significant measures have been taken to reduce the deficit.

In the summer of 2013, the Government announced a new reform of the electricity market. Under the 24/213 Power Sector Act, the FiT system was stopped in July 2013 and the new schemes are based on the remuneration of capacities rather than production. The new system is based on estimated standard costs, with a legal possibility to change the amounts paid every four years. This has caused many projects to be in a state of default. The biggest project has changed hands, since international investors found interests in the acquisition of this projects.

The 24/2013 Power Sector Act considers very restrictive forms of self-consumption. During 2015 the regulatory framework for self-consumption was developed under Royal Decree (RD) 900/2015. This RD established that the maximum capacity of the self-consumption installation must be equal or below the contracted capacity. It also specifies two types of self-consumers:
• Type 1: maximum capacity installed of 100 kW – there is no compensation for the electricity surplus fed in the grid.
• Type 2: no limit to the allowed capacity – the surplus can be sold in the wholesale market directly or through an intermediary. A specific grid tax of 0.5 €/MWh has to be paid together with a 7% tax on the electricity produced.

Regulation indicates that self-generated power above 10 kW is charged with a fee per kWh consumed as a “grid backup toll”, commonly known as the “sunshine tax”. Adding battery storage to the installation also implies an additional tax. Geographical compensation is not allowed, and self-consumption for several end customers or a community is not allowed.

The Spanish PV industry has obviously, still on the downside with taxes, applied to self-consumers and no feed-in-tariff at all. However, grid parity has been reached in Spain thanks to two factors: rich solar irradiation resource and good prices for components. Given the context of no feed-in-tariff, the future of the Spanish PV market lies in the deployment of big PV plants and the elimination of the self-consumption barriers. However, the opposition political parties and the main social stakeholders have expressed their support to a fair development of PV through self-consumption, and depending on the 2016 elections outcome in Spain, the regulation could change again. Given the need to meet the EU energy and climate 2020 targets and the Paris Agreement, It is of utmost importance that a new legislative framework is developed in Spain promoting the use of renewable energies again.

So Self-consumption is allowed in Spain. Tips to highlight:

· The size of the PV plant cannot exceed the maximum power contracted.
· Two different regulations exists depending on the system size:
·· Type 1: under 100 kW, self-consumption is allowed but the prosumer receives no compensation for the excess PV electricity injected into the grid.
·· Type 2: Above 100 kW without limitation, self-consumption is allowed and the excess PV electricity can be sold on the wholesale market directly or through an intermediary. A specific grid tax of 0.5 EUR/MWh has to be paid together with a 7% tax on the electricity produced.
· All systems used for self-consumption above 10 kW are charged with a fee per KWh consumed. It is justified as a “grid backup toll” and is known as the so-called “Sun tax”.
· At least two meters have to be installed, depending of the cases (LV or HV connection).
· Adding battery storage implies also an extra additional tax.
· Geographical compensation is not allowed, and self-consumption for several end customers or a community is not allowed.

± Tax Collector: Type 1 or Type 2
Spain’s Self-Consumption Schemes
Sources:

FAIR TRADING COMMISSION, Renewable Energy Rider Decision, 2013: http://bit.ly/1DLIeG4
"PRESS RELEASE -COMMISSION INCREASES THE CAPACITY LIMIT OF THE RENEWABLE ENERGY RIDER TO 9MW”, Fair Trading Commission, Barbados: http://bit.ly/1whpiGs
At The Heart of Clean Energy Journalism

EGA is registered as 14,302 Engineer at COITIMadrid

07 June, 2016

Solar PV Own-Consumption In Rural Areas

As widely reported, the solar photovoltaic energy penetration in Spain reached a cumulative installed PV capacity of 4,667 MW at the end of December 2015, according to the latest statistics released by Spanish grid operator Red Eléctrica de España (REE). 4,423 MW of this  capacity was installed in Spain’s mainland, while 78 MW and 166 MW were installed in the Balearic Islands and the Canary Islands, respectively.

The installed solar power represents 4.3 percent of the country’s total generation capacity. The country had 4,656 MW of installed PV capacity at the end of 2014. This means that in 2015 approximately 11 MW of PV systems were connected to the grid in Spain. In 2014, only 7 MW of new PV capacity was installed. Read the Renewables 2016 Global Status Report for more. Check out REN21’s Renewables Interactive Map for country specific data.
Courtesy: REN21
While from recognized instances it augurs that could become to the order of 30 percentA big part of that future development will be based on the photovoltaic own-consumption, and one of the great hopes should focus on facilities in rural areas, as it can and should be an alternative to current systems of power generation and a significant improvement in energy efficiency.

2015 Renewable records worldwide:

The installed renewable capacity increased by 147 GW, but Spain shows a general stagnation in almost all sectors.




2015 was an "extraordinary" year for renewable energies worldwide, according to the latest report qualifies REN21 2016 GSR (Renewables 2016 Global Status Report). Total renewable power installed at the end of last year reached 1,849 GW. In this world stage, the EU has lost its leadership by reducing its investment in clean energy by 21% in 2015, returning to the levels of 2006. On Spain, the report highlights the gradual disappearance of our country from the PV world map.

First published in 2005, this report is the result of a collaborative work which involved some 500 authors. Its aim is to analyze the state of the markets of renewable energies and political trends and industry innovations.

According to the document REN21 association in 2015 renewable power across the globe increased by 147 GW, the highest figure to date. In many markets, clean energy have been placed as the main energy source. This rapid growth is due to several factors such as increased cost competitiveness of renewable sources compared to fossil fuels, favoring political initiatives for this sector, improving access to funding, greater concern for energy security and the environment or demand growth in emerging economies.

In late 2015, countries with the highest total installed renewable capacity are China, US, Brazil, Germany and Canada. In Europe, for the eighth consecutive year, renewables account for 77% of the capacity of energy production, but overall a downward trend in many Member States, due to declining investment.

Focusing on Spain, and specifically in the solar sector, the report regrets that after leading the market in 2008, the presence of our country in the photovoltaic map has been gradually disappearing due to the retroactive policy changes and rates for own consumption.

Another aspect that the report highlights of Spain is that just added new capacity to the installed renewable electricity capacity. In CSP technology, for example, it notes that during 2015 no recorded infrastructure construction or new projects for 2016 are expected.


As for solar energy, we note that this market fell by 6% in Spain, in line with the European scene, where only Denmark and Poland shed positive growth data. Among the reasons for this shrinking market at Community level, the report points out complicated bureaucratic procedures subsidy schemes, the decline in construction of new buildings and competition from other thermal technologies.

Opportunities that this system would bring to society are fundamentally creating mechanisms that undoubtedly:

• would cheapen the cost of energy in homes, businesses and industries subsistence users in rural areas
• would assurance to meet European commitments development of renewable (the now famous 20-20-20) and new objectives set out in cop21
• would reduce energy dependence on fossil fuels, with a better balance of the balance of payments
• would create a scenario of "energy democratization", which will result in the welfare of citizens.

Biomass technologies, Wind and Solar can cover nowadays the spectrum of energy consumption, although the photovoltaic seems to cover most of the power demand in the coming years.

The installation of photovoltaic own consumption is stronger, since small productive farms and rural residents are increasingly interested in installing on their properties electrical systems due to lower installation prices in recent years with costs below the €10 cents per kWh within the scope of a purchase agreement valid for a period of 25 years.

PV-Water Pumping Irrigation Systems:

This type of facility meets the new needs of irrigators to provide water for dry-lands in a much more economical way, because everything that involves improving the supply and dispose of water use for irrigation is a real progress for these farmers and also for all regions.

There are vast amounts of land which could facilitate the use of irrigated cultivated lands, by no means of arable land irrigated. Therefore the chances that pumping would be endless arable dry-lands.

Photovoltaic solar energy in rural areas contributes to the fight against climate change:

The commitment to photovoltaic solar energy in rural areas as a means of combating climate change and active policies to fight in this area provide an opportunity for the future development of rural areas, since in this respect the commitment renewable energy can stimulate economic diversification and creation of new jobs, improving the management of agricultural land, increasing the efficiency of agricultural machinery, giving economic output and agricultural products through energy recovery.

Therefore, the photovoltaic solar energy installations are a good solution for isolated network facilities where they have to produce their own electricity, in many cases with diesel generators.

Development Actions for Rural Own-Consumption:

Although solar PV is well known, in addition to the significant damage that is causing the application of tolls on self-consumption, there are a number of prejudices, like the remaining tariff deficit, widespread in the past, that have a bad image to the sector, requiring the performing a series of actions for its normal development:

• Disseminate this technology among farmers to understand that solar energy photovoltaic solves many problems of its energy and electricity needs.
• To encourage more professionals photovoltaic solar energy, to spread the great opportunity it posed to rural areas, offering their services to farmers and rural dwellers.
• Itemize the different cost-effective solutions for photovoltaic solar energy in rural areas, both connected to the network, as well as off-grid facilities.
• Promoting innovation in autonomous or connected photovoltaic solar power grid, involving autonomous administrations and local authorities.

Hopefully the addition of all these actions in the future government will perform the necessary changes in the sector, so that solar PV will continue to be a vector for growth as SolarPower CEO James Watson said «In the current post-feed-in tariff climate, we must make sure we have the right electricity market design and the right long-term investment signals for solar to flourish. We hope that the European Commission’s forthcoming market design reform and Renewable Energy Directive will pave the way for the 200 GW benchmark,»

EGA is registered as 14.302 engineer at COITIM

18 October, 2015

In a Sunny Country... Wind & Solar Hibrid Power

Hey man, In an #energy context such #Spain, where we must meet the EU targets for renewable energy by 2020, remember the importance of the #solar #pv and #wind #power inside our electricity #mix and just because we are in a country that has great resources for these two technologies, and by the way, only by joinning together two small isolated facilities in the area, which already found their owners the importance of having a few photovoltaic modules and a small wind turbine all together.



Hibrid facilities like the ones which we all have seen on Spanish roads, plus facilities that have been made by owners who have put their own money, to see how costly it was to bring the utility line of duty.

But besides this type of remote installations, where storage is present, you also could consider, as in many other parts of the world, to combine both technologies in On Grid installations, using and making profitable the same resources, you can get scale economics. While this may in some cases incur a small loss on the premises, by the interaction between this two technologies.

It is known that the hibrid site construction (solar and wind) complement each other better than it looks, but make a small summary of some of these synergies on why this happens:

• A wind farm site has surfaces on which you can install an additional photovoltaic plant.
• The combination of photovoltaic and wind systems, can make the same resource of land occupied, can produce up to twice as much electricity, while it was found that the losses caused by shading of the turbines are just only considered to be at the order of two percent at most.
• The construction of such plants hybrid energy does not require network expansion because these plants generate wind and solar energy at different times, which means that the level fed into the grid is more stable than wind power plants and photovoltaic alone.
• The effects on power grids, this type of facilities photovoltaic and wind energy in electricity networks, both global and regional level, makes these networks behave in a much more stable, because while producing wind turbines much more electricity during the coldest parts of the year, due to higher levels of wind over the winter months, the solar power plants generate more energy in summer, offsetting lower production of wind energy at this time of year.
• Losses wind shading on photovoltaic installations are minimal (evidently for that are also the designers).
• The common elements that will be used by each facility, such as network connections, authorizations, driveway, mains power evacuation, …, will lead to significant cost reductions, in addition to the aforementioned stabilization of energy production.
But besides synergies, when seeing the whole project, also a series of mutual interactions between the two facilities will be taken:
• The integration of the PV plant within the wind, generate a reduction of wind speed and wind profile disturbance, and consequently the energy production of the wind farm decreases, although very little.
• In the interaction of the wind farm on the PV system must be taken into account among others, the following topics:
- The slopes of the available areas
- The own shadows on the horizon
- The impact of shadow generated by wind turbines

But all this can be a good project circumvented in some cases, taking into account the effects of possible stabilization in production, mixing the two types of technologies, as we will have:
• wind during winter, while solar radiation is low but very efficient production in sunny days due to less cell temperature
• wind during the night, when there is obviously no radiation
• wind during the rainy and cloudy days, while radiation is low
• Good radiation on sunny days, when we anticyclone, and we have wind

A profit will also be in Capex (capital expenditure), due to the synergies between the wind farm and photovoltaic system:
• Cost of installed electrical equipment
• Cost of energy networks evacuation
• Costs of civil engineering works (access, roads …)
• Cost of land lease
• Stabilization of the energy produced

All this should be compared with revenue losses already mentioned, when they are operating the two facilities, due to the loss of energy production, as losses due to the PV system, can cause a loss of income below 1 5% by photovoltaic systems, and losses in the turbine, can also cause a loss of income below 2% (compared with independent photovoltaic plant, according to some studies consulted).
The study should be complete and contemplate:
  • The mutual interactions
  • Annual degradation modules
  • Rates
  • Discount rates
Other points where synergies could be established is in operation and maintenance activities, although it is more difficult in some of its aspects have staff specialized in both technologies, but those common elements can be treated together, after having more specialized staff Specific elements of the different facilities.

Say that, although it seems that there are lights and shadows, international experiences made are positive. And in the future framework for distributed generation and smart grids, making the generation is stable, and that fits as far as possible to demand, will make use of existing networks and lower requirements Additional investments are to collect more and more important. Not to mention that in some cases it is not possible to perform short-term lines due to environmental problems.


It is for all this, so important to conduct this type of hibrid facilities, with only renewable technologies, for cases of small isolated facilities to small and medium connected to network an important consumption facilities, and avoid the use of large MW existing sites, where the combination of the two technologies can lead us to some technical and economic synergies.